[FILMES] - Notícias e trailers! (trancado)

Smith escreveu:Acho que a primeira vez que o McFarlane disse isso já faz uns 10 anos.

McFarlane (cnt'd): So, the idea I'm working on with the [new] Spawn movies is not one that would sell toys, and I'm a guy who makes toys. It may be a stupid [move]. You may ask why, but it's because I'm trying to come up with the coolest movie. At the end of that idea, if it doesn't have any toy potential, that's okay. That's okay. I don't know that there was a bunch of Jaws toys when that movie came out. It was just a cool movie. Movies should be movies and then if you can make t-shirts and mugs later -- don't worry about it. I don't know if they made a lot of toys of Sleepless in Seattle, but people still went to it. It was a movie, people enjoyed the movie. Fine. Done. Next. Don't worry about the ancillary, that shouldn't be the driving force. And luckily with DVD sales increasing, they've gotten away from that in Hollywood, where they have to tie it into licensing products. They don't have that need anymore.

IGN Comics: Where do you stand with the next Spawn movie? Where is it in terms of production and what have you taken from the experience of the first movie to make this one a lot better?

McFarlane: Well, "a lot better," I leave that in the eye of the beholder. Spawn has always been something in my mind that, even though I started it as a superhero comic book, it was always like way more than that. There was always a lot more spiritual and again with some of the religious overtones in there and the ghostly aspects, and I like dark and gritty horror stuff too. To me it's like, there's plenty of superhero stuff. No one's going to give me a $70 million budget to do Spider-Man anyway, so forget it. Don't even go there. So how can I get it into a realm that makes sense to me, especially as I get older. The answer is to ground it, as weird as it is, eliminate the fantastic as much as possible, which may seem like an odd thing. And when I say that, it means that Spawn becomes the only fantastic element in the story.

[...]

IGN Comics: Do you have a targeted date for it. Are you thinking 2007 or is it too early to say?

McFarlane: In a perfect world, I'd like to put it out next year. I'm in the middle of writing it now. It depends how many times I go over the script. I might be quite pleased with it and get some notes from people I trust, but my guess is I'm probably gonna grind this thing over three or four or five times. I'd love to do production in the first half of the year and that means I could get it out in time Halloween of next year. It shouldn't be a long shoot. It's not an overly complicated story. It's fairly contained. Why? I don't have a big budget. I've got to keep the story consistent with the budget. I think we could shoot this thing in two months.

Todd McFarlane afirmou, em entrevista para Vulture, que no filme Spawn "o protagonista não será Spawn". A ideia pareceu confusa durante anos para Hollywood, contou ele.

"Lembro de falar que o personagem de Spawn não falava e todos achavam estranho. 'Não entendo o que você quer dizer. Como você pode ter um filme e o personagem do título não falar?' e eu dizia 'entendo sua confusão, mas quando eu era criança assista a um filme chamado Tubarão, não sei se vocês conhecem. O protagonista não tinhas muitas falas", afirmou. "Nunca vou ter Sprawn num traje de latex, dizendo 'estou aqui, meninos e meninas, para salvá-los e seu dia será incrível'. Não, teremos apenas momentos em que coisas vão acontecer, como um tubarão em águas negras, e você morrerá."

Zell escreveu:Moto do Kaneda

James Cameron Wants to Reinvent Terminator With New Trilogy

netin escreveu:Sim mas o envolvimento do Cameron seria pra quando nessa agenda escassa dele? 2025?